Replays
Live games and saved replays from across the community.
Winners
10th ➔ 8th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1072
- Team average: 1052 against 1048.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1081
163rd ➔ 141st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 980
- Team average: 1052 against 1048.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 989
1st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1204
- Team average: 1052 against 1048.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1213
186th ➔ 180th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 954
- Team average: 1052 against 1048.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 963
vs
Losers
28th ➔ 38th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1024
- Team average: 1048 against 1052.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1015
15th ➔ 19th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1053
- Team average: 1048 against 1052.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1044
182nd ➔ 189th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 955
- Team average: 1048 against 1052.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 946
2nd ➔ 3rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1163
- Team average: 1048 against 1052.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1154
Winners
10th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1063
- Team average: 1050 against 1050.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1072
38th ➔ 28th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1015
- Team average: 1050 against 1050.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1024
177th ➔ 163rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 971
- Team average: 1050 against 1050.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 980
3rd ➔ 2nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1154
- Team average: 1050 against 1050.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1163
vs
Losers
180th ➔ 182nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 964
- Team average: 1050 against 1050.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 955
11th ➔ 15th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1062
- Team average: 1050 against 1050.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1053
1st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1213
- Team average: 1050 against 1050.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1204
181st ➔ 186th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 963
- Team average: 1050 against 1050.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 954
Winners
154th ➔ 115th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1004 against 976.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1008
110th ➔ 62nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1008
- Team average: 1004 against 976.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1016
107th ➔ 61st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1008
- Team average: 1004 against 976.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1016
136th ➔ 107th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1001
- Team average: 1004 against 976.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1009
vs
Losers
393rd ➔ 398th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 966
- Team average: 976 against 1004.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 958
unranked ➔ 251st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 976 against 1004.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 992
408th ➔ 412th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 947
- Team average: 976 against 1004.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 939
238th ➔ 327th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 992
- Team average: 976 against 1004.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 984
Winners
181st ➔ 177th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 962
- Team average: 1069 against 1069.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 971
4th ➔ 3rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1145
- Team average: 1069 against 1069.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1154
16th ➔ 14th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1051
- Team average: 1069 against 1069.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1060
5th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1120
- Team average: 1069 against 1069.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1129
vs
Losers
9th ➔ 10th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1072
- Team average: 1069 against 1069.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1063
1st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1222
- Team average: 1069 against 1069.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1213
11th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1071
- Team average: 1069 against 1069.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1062
198th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 913
- Team average: 1069 against 1069.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 904
Winners
1st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1213
- Team average: 1072 against 1069.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1222
12th ➔ 11th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1062
- Team average: 1072 against 1069.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1071
5th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1111
- Team average: 1072 against 1069.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1120
198th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 904
- Team average: 1072 against 1069.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 913
vs
Losers
8th ➔ 9th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1081
- Team average: 1069 against 1072.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1072
177th ➔ 181st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 971
- Team average: 1069 against 1072.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 962
3rd ➔ 4th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1154
- Team average: 1069 against 1072.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1145
11th ➔ 13th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1070
- Team average: 1069 against 1072.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1061
thats why i never play 4v4s .. sry for dc guys
♥ 1
Winners
27th ➔ 26th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1038
- Team average: 1085 against 994.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1042
1st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1239
- Team average: 1085 against 994.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1243
170th ➔ 141st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 997
- Team average: 1085 against 994.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1001
17th ➔ 15th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1069
- Team average: 1085 against 994.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1073
vs
Losers
unranked ➔ 180th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 994 against 1085.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 996
384th ➔ 393rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 970
- Team average: 994 against 1085.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 966
unranked ➔ 181st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 994 against 1085.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 996
118th ➔ 128th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1006
- Team average: 994 against 1085.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 1002
Winners
10th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1092
- Team average: 1125 against 1025.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1096
11th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1089
- Team average: 1125 against 1025.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1093
1st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1235
- Team average: 1125 against 1025.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1239
12th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1086
- Team average: 1125 against 1025.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1090
vs
Losers
331st ➔ 350th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 984
- Team average: 1025 against 1125.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 980
26th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1042
- Team average: 1025 against 1125.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 1038
134th ➔ 166th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1001
- Team average: 1025 against 1125.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 997
15th ➔ 17th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1073
- Team average: 1025 against 1125.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 1069
Winners
1st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1231
- Team average: 1090 against 992.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1235
354th ➔ 331st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 980
- Team average: 1090 against 992.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 984
12th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1082
- Team average: 1090 against 992.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1086
17th ➔ 15th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1069
- Team average: 1090 against 992.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +4.
- Rating after: 1073
vs
Losers
91st ➔ 119th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1009
- Team average: 992 against 1090.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 1005
187th ➔ 250th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 995
- Team average: 992 against 1090.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 991
unranked ➔ 179th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 992 against 1090.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 996
392nd ➔ 393rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 964
- Team average: 992 against 1090.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -4.
- Rating after: 960
Winners
1st · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1224
- Team average: 1083 against 1051.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1231
377th ➔ 354th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 973
- Team average: 1083 against 1051.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 980
19th ➔ 17th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1062
- Team average: 1083 against 1051.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1069
14th ➔ 12th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1075
- Team average: 1083 against 1051.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1082
vs
Losers
unranked ➔ 233rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1000
- Team average: 1051 against 1083.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 993
5th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1137
- Team average: 1051 against 1083.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1130
12th ➔ 14th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1080
- Team average: 1051 against 1083.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1073
314th ➔ 349th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 987
- Team average: 1051 against 1083.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 980
Winners
24th ➔ 22nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1049
- Team average: 1037 against 1041.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1058
403rd ➔ 396th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 949
- Team average: 1037 against 1041.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 958
11th ➔ 10th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1083
- Team average: 1037 against 1041.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1092
17th ➔ 13th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1069
- Team average: 1037 against 1041.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1078
vs
Losers
338th ➔ 377th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 982
- Team average: 1041 against 1037.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 973
10th ➔ 11th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1098
- Team average: 1041 against 1037.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1089
57th ➔ 115th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1016
- Team average: 1041 against 1037.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1007
14th ➔ 19th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1071
- Team average: 1041 against 1037.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1062
Winners
26th ➔ 24th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1040
- Team average: 1028 against 1050.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1049
407th ➔ 403rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 940
- Team average: 1028 against 1050.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 949
14th ➔ 11th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1074
- Team average: 1028 against 1050.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1083
19th ➔ 17th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1060
- Team average: 1028 against 1050.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1069
vs
Losers
290th ➔ 338th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 991
- Team average: 1050 against 1028.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 982
10th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1107
- Team average: 1050 against 1028.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1098
46th ➔ 57th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1025
- Team average: 1050 against 1028.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1016
12th ➔ 14th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1080
- Team average: 1050 against 1028.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1071
Winners
338th ➔ 290th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 982
- Team average: 1041 against 1037.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 991
10th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1098
- Team average: 1041 against 1037.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1107
57th ➔ 46th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1016
- Team average: 1041 against 1037.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1025
14th ➔ 12th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1071
- Team average: 1041 against 1037.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1080
vs
Losers
24th ➔ 26th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1049
- Team average: 1037 against 1041.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1040
403rd ➔ 407th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 949
- Team average: 1037 against 1041.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 940
11th ➔ 14th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1083
- Team average: 1037 against 1041.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1074
17th ➔ 19th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1069
- Team average: 1037 against 1041.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1060
Winners
vs
Losers
22nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1060
- Opponent rating: 1074.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 1052
Winners
vs
Losers
23rd ➔ 24th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1058
- Opponent rating: 1052.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1049
Winners
23rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1050
- Team average: 1066 against 1042.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1058
22nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1052
- Team average: 1066 against 1042.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1060
14th ➔ 11th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1075
- Team average: 1066 against 1042.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1083
10th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1090
- Team average: 1066 against 1042.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1098
vs
Losers
294th ➔ 338th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 990
- Team average: 1042 against 1066.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 982
46th ➔ 57th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1024
- Team average: 1042 against 1066.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 1016
12th ➔ 14th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1079
- Team average: 1042 against 1066.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 1071
13th ➔ 17th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1077
- Team average: 1042 against 1066.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 1069
Winners
345th ➔ 294th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 981
- Team average: 1050 against 1059.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 990
11th ➔ 10th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1081
- Team average: 1050 against 1059.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1090
15th ➔ 12th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1070
- Team average: 1050 against 1059.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1079
17th ➔ 13th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1068
- Team average: 1050 against 1059.
- An even match.
- Win: +9.
- Rating after: 1077
vs
Losers
23rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1059
- Team average: 1059 against 1050.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1050
20th ➔ 22nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1061
- Team average: 1059 against 1050.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1052
10th ➔ 14th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1084
- Team average: 1059 against 1050.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1075
32nd ➔ 46th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1033
- Team average: 1059 against 1050.
- An even match.
- Loss: -9.
- Rating after: 1024
Winners
23rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1052
- Team average: 1064 against 1028.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1059
22nd ➔ 20th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1054
- Team average: 1064 against 1028.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1061
11th ➔ 10th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1077
- Team average: 1064 against 1028.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1084
14th ➔ 11th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1074
- Team average: 1064 against 1028.
- Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
- Win: +7.
- Rating after: 1081
vs
Losers
309th ➔ 345th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 988
- Team average: 1028 against 1064.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 981
84th ➔ 129th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1009
- Team average: 1028 against 1064.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1002
27th ➔ 32nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1040
- Team average: 1028 against 1064.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1033
12th ➔ 15th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1077
- Team average: 1028 against 1064.
- Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
- Loss: -7.
- Rating after: 1070
this not balanced wtf
♥ 1
Winners
351st ➔ 309th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 980
- Team average: 1040 against 1018.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 988
24th ➔ 22nd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1046
- Team average: 1040 against 1018.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1054
19th ➔ 14th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1066
- Team average: 1040 against 1018.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1074
15th ➔ 12th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1069
- Team average: 1040 against 1018.
- An even match.
- Win: +8.
- Rating after: 1077
vs
Losers
354th ➔ 379th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 979
- Team average: 1018 against 1040.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 971
21st ➔ 23rd · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1060
- Team average: 1018 against 1040.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 1052
10th ➔ 11th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 1085
- Team average: 1018 against 1040.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 1077
403rd ➔ 406th · How this was worked out
- Rating before: 950
- Team average: 1018 against 1040.
- An even match.
- Loss: -8.
- Rating after: 942
Winners
5th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
48th ➔ 38th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
29th ➔ 25th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
19th ➔ 16th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
vs
Losers
32nd ➔ 35th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
367th ➔ 381st · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
unranked ➔ 215th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
unranked ➔ 216th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Winners
27th ➔ 25th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
368th ➔ 351st · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
1st · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
18th ➔ 15th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
vs
Losers
389th ➔ 394th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
152nd ➔ 171st · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
406th ➔ 407th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
unranked ➔ 178th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Winners
33rd ➔ 27th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
376th ➔ 368th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
1st · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
21st ➔ 18th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
vs
Losers
386th ➔ 389th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
25th ➔ 32nd · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
unranked ➔ 190th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
312th ➔ 342nd · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Winners
2nd ➔ 1st · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
177th ➔ 157th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
35th ➔ 33rd · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
13th ➔ 12th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
vs
Losers
405th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
124th ➔ 142nd · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
234th ➔ 294th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
288th ➔ 311th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Winners
3rd ➔ 2nd · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
387th ➔ 377th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
47th ➔ 35th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
17th ➔ 13th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
vs
Losers
105th ➔ 124th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
388th ➔ 389th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
103rd ➔ 123rd · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
378th ➔ 387th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Winners
3rd · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
389th ➔ 387th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
51st ➔ 47th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
18th ➔ 17th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
vs
Losers
231st ➔ 306th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
373rd ➔ 378th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
156th ➔ 178th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
379th ➔ 388th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Winners
3rd · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
395th ➔ 389th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
61st ➔ 51st · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
22nd ➔ 18th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
vs
Losers
376th ➔ 379th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
356th ➔ 373rd · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
405th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
389th ➔ 390th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Winners
3rd · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
396th ➔ 395th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
110th ➔ 61st · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
22nd · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
vs
Losers
353rd ➔ 377th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
66th ➔ 122nd · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
unranked ➔ 211th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
unranked ➔ 212th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Winners
3rd · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
398th ➔ 396th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
134th ➔ 110th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
24th ➔ 22nd · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
vs
Losers
50th ➔ 63rd · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
unranked ➔ 226th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
315th ➔ 353rd · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
131st ➔ 179th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Winners
3rd · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
187th ➔ 134th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
29th ➔ 24th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
401st ➔ 398th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
vs
Losers
316th ➔ 353rd · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
227th ➔ 315th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
184th ➔ 294th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
41st ➔ 50th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Winners
189th ➔ 186th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
138th ➔ 79th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
37th ➔ 30th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
50th ➔ 34th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
vs
Losers
175th ➔ 178th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
58th ➔ 63rd · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
152nd ➔ 167th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
45th ➔ 62nd · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Winners
11th ➔ 10th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
25th ➔ 23rd · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
21st ➔ 16th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
34th ➔ 25th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
vs
Losers
32nd ➔ 40th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
15th ➔ 18th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
179th ➔ 305th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
13th ➔ 17th · How this was worked out
- The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
- This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.