Replays

Live games and saved replays from across the community.

RotWK
All games BFME1 BFME2 RotWK
All patches
All patches Edain Ladder Edition Edain Unchained Ennorath Patch 2.02
All versions
All versions
All match types
All match types Quickmatch Clan war Tournament Co-op
4 versus 4
All gamemodes 1 versus 1 2 versus 2 3 versus 3 4 versus 4 FFA
Clan war[CP] vs [TDM] · Game 2 of 2War: [CP] won 2-0[CP] 1098 → 1105 How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1098
  • Clan ratings: 1098 against 949.
  • Expected result: 70%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war won, counts as 1.
  • Step size: 32.
  • These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 75%.
  • Rating after: 1105
32 × (1 - 0.70) × 0.75 = +7 · #2[TDM] 949 → 942 How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 949
  • Clan ratings: 949 against 1098.
  • Expected result: 30%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war lost, counts as 0.
  • Step size: 32.
  • These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 75%.
  • Rating after: 942
32 × (0 - 0.30) × 0.75 = -7 · #6Placement war, counts double: _Gimli_These players met often this week, so player changes count 75%.These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 75%.
Winners
Masho
9th ➔ 8th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1062
  • Side average: 1122 against 996.
  • Expected result: 67%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war won, counts as 1.
  • Step size: 40.
  • These players met often this week, so player changes count 75%.
  • Rating after: 1072
40 × (1 - 0.67) × 0.75 = +10
konkwi31
3rd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1235
  • Side average: 1122 against 996.
  • Expected result: 67%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war won, counts as 1.
  • Step size: 40.
  • These players met often this week, so player changes count 75%.
  • Rating after: 1245
40 × (1 - 0.67) × 0.75 = +10
HaroonZ
23rd ➔ 24th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 895
  • Side average: 1122 against 996.
  • Expected result: 67%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war won, counts as 1.
  • Step size: 40.
  • These players met often this week, so player changes count 75%.
  • Rating after: 905
40 × (1 - 0.67) × 0.75 = +10
Poero
2nd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1294
  • Side average: 1122 against 996.
  • Expected result: 67%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war won, counts as 1.
  • Step size: 40.
  • These players met often this week, so player changes count 75%.
  • Rating after: 1304
40 × (1 - 0.67) × 0.75 = +10
vs
Losers
Kyagara
19th ➔ 20th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 966
  • Side average: 996 against 1122.
  • Expected result: 33%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war lost, counts as 0.
  • Step size: 40.
  • These players met often this week, so player changes count 75%.
  • Rating after: 956
40 × (0 - 0.33) × 0.75 = -10
_Gimli_
unranked ➔ 23rd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 964
  • Side average: 996 against 1122.
  • Expected result: 33%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war lost, counts as 0.
  • Step size: 80, doubled for placement war 5 of 5.
  • These players met often this week, so player changes count 75%.
  • Rating after: 944
80 × (0 - 0.33) × 0.75 = -20
Eternity
8th ➔ 10th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1063
  • Side average: 996 against 1122.
  • Expected result: 33%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war lost, counts as 0.
  • Step size: 40.
  • These players met often this week, so player changes count 75%.
  • Rating after: 1053
40 × (0 - 0.33) × 0.75 = -10
Maxx
17th ➔ 18th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 989
  • Side average: 996 against 1122.
  • Expected result: 33%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war lost, counts as 0.
  • Step size: 40.
  • These players met often this week, so player changes count 75%.
  • Rating after: 979
40 × (0 - 0.33) × 0.75 = -10
Harnen Valley
Harnen Valley
GameRotWK
PatchPatch 2.02 (9.8.0)
GamemodeClan war
Duration00:40:45
Date1792789560497
ELO +/--
Likes0
Comments2
Downloads4
Plays2
ReplayDownload
DiscussOpen to like & comment
Watch list
Comments (2)
Ahwehawe
Masho fighting world war 4 whole game
HaroonZ
Masho ultimate team mate
Clan war[CP] vs [TDM] · Game 1 of 2War: [CP] won 2-0[CP] 1098 → 1105 How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1098
  • Clan ratings: 1098 against 949.
  • Expected result: 70%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war won, counts as 1.
  • Step size: 32.
  • These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 75%.
  • Rating after: 1105
32 × (1 - 0.70) × 0.75 = +7 · #2[TDM] 949 → 942 How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 949
  • Clan ratings: 949 against 1098.
  • Expected result: 30%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war lost, counts as 0.
  • Step size: 32.
  • These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 75%.
  • Rating after: 942
32 × (0 - 0.30) × 0.75 = -7 · #6Placement war, counts double: _Gimli_These players met often this week, so player changes count 75%.These clans met often this week, so clan changes count 75%.
Winners
Masho
9th ➔ 8th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1062
  • Side average: 1122 against 996.
  • Expected result: 67%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war won, counts as 1.
  • Step size: 40.
  • These players met often this week, so player changes count 75%.
  • Rating after: 1072
40 × (1 - 0.67) × 0.75 = +10
konkwi31
3rd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1235
  • Side average: 1122 against 996.
  • Expected result: 67%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war won, counts as 1.
  • Step size: 40.
  • These players met often this week, so player changes count 75%.
  • Rating after: 1245
40 × (1 - 0.67) × 0.75 = +10
HaroonZ
23rd ➔ 24th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 895
  • Side average: 1122 against 996.
  • Expected result: 67%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war won, counts as 1.
  • Step size: 40.
  • These players met often this week, so player changes count 75%.
  • Rating after: 905
40 × (1 - 0.67) × 0.75 = +10
Poero
2nd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1294
  • Side average: 1122 against 996.
  • Expected result: 67%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war won, counts as 1.
  • Step size: 40.
  • These players met often this week, so player changes count 75%.
  • Rating after: 1304
40 × (1 - 0.67) × 0.75 = +10
vs
Losers
Kyagara
19th ➔ 20th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 966
  • Side average: 996 against 1122.
  • Expected result: 33%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war lost, counts as 0.
  • Step size: 40.
  • These players met often this week, so player changes count 75%.
  • Rating after: 956
40 × (0 - 0.33) × 0.75 = -10
_Gimli_
unranked ➔ 23rd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 964
  • Side average: 996 against 1122.
  • Expected result: 33%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war lost, counts as 0.
  • Step size: 80, doubled for placement war 5 of 5.
  • These players met often this week, so player changes count 75%.
  • Rating after: 944
80 × (0 - 0.33) × 0.75 = -20
Eternity
8th ➔ 10th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1063
  • Side average: 996 against 1122.
  • Expected result: 33%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war lost, counts as 0.
  • Step size: 40.
  • These players met often this week, so player changes count 75%.
  • Rating after: 1053
40 × (0 - 0.33) × 0.75 = -10
Maxx
17th ➔ 18th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 989
  • Side average: 996 against 1122.
  • Expected result: 33%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war lost, counts as 0.
  • Step size: 40.
  • These players met often this week, so player changes count 75%.
  • Rating after: 979
40 × (0 - 0.33) × 0.75 = -10
Emerald Islet II
Emerald Islet II
GameRotWK
PatchPatch 2.02 (9.8.0)
GamemodeClan war
Duration00:28:29
Date1792787478072
ELO +/--
Likes0
Comments0
Downloads3
Plays1
ReplayDownload
DiscussOpen to like & comment
Watch list
Winners
Galmod
4th ➔ 2nd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1003
  • Team average: 994 against 997.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1012
Pharita
1st · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1018
  • Team average: 994 against 997.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1027
AlphaLurch
39th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 955
  • Team average: 994 against 997.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 964
SooS-Yolo
5th ➔ 3rd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1003
  • Team average: 994 against 997.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1012
vs
Losers
gigagiga50
28th ➔ 35th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 991
  • Team average: 997 against 994.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 982
technik
11th ➔ 17th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 997 against 994.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 991
Snens
6th ➔ 16th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 997 against 994.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 991
DasAADDD
15th ➔ 18th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 997 against 994.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 991
Der Fluss Adorn
Der Fluss Adorn
GameRotWK
PatchEdain Unchained (4.4.3)
Gamemode4 versus 4
Duration00:20:27
Date1792700580828
ELO +/-9
Likes0
Comments0
Downloads3
Plays0
ReplayDownload
DiscussOpen to like & comment
Watch list
Winners
Kyagara
29th ➔ 27th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1018
  • Team average: 1000 against 1026.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1027
Maxx
62nd ➔ 55th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1000 against 1026.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1009
RTOZZZZZZZ
139th ➔ 80th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 991
  • Team average: 1000 against 1026.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1000
Mrpepinot
140th ➔ 81st · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 991
  • Team average: 1000 against 1026.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1000
vs
Losers
Matty
3rd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1170
  • Team average: 1026 against 1000.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1161
Bredrik
165th ➔ 179th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 981
  • Team average: 1026 against 1000.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 972
HaroonZ
182nd ➔ 184th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 972
  • Team average: 1026 against 1000.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 963
Luke6193
155th ➔ 167th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 983
  • Team average: 1026 against 1000.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 974
South Ithilien
South Ithilien
GameRotWK
PatchPatch 2.02 (9.8.0)
Gamemode4 versus 4
Duration00:12:19
Date1792623334548
ELO +/-9
Likes0
Comments0
Downloads5
Plays1
ReplayDownload
DiscussOpen to like & comment
Watch list
Winners
Matty
3rd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1161
  • Team average: 1017 against 1009.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1170
Bredrik
179th ➔ 165th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 972
  • Team average: 1017 against 1009.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 981
Luke6193
165th ➔ 155th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 974
  • Team average: 1017 against 1009.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 983
HaroonZ
182nd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 963
  • Team average: 1017 against 1009.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 972
vs
Losers
Kyagara
24th ➔ 29th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1027
  • Team average: 1009 against 1017.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1018
Maxx
39th ➔ 62nd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1009
  • Team average: 1009 against 1017.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1000
RTOZZZZZZZ
unranked ➔ 139th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1009 against 1017.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 991
Mrpepinot
unranked ➔ 140th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1009 against 1017.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 991
Eastfarthing Hills
Eastfarthing Hills
GameRotWK
PatchPatch 2.02 (9.8.0)
Gamemode4 versus 4
Duration00:14:48
Date1792622309481
ELO +/-9
Likes0
Comments0
Downloads7
Plays0
ReplayDownload
DiscussOpen to like & comment
Watch list
Winners
Matty
5th ➔ 3rd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1153
  • Team average: 1013 against 995.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +8.
  • Rating after: 1161
Bredrik
181st ➔ 179th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 964
  • Team average: 1013 against 995.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +8.
  • Rating after: 972
HaroonZ
186th ➔ 182nd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 955
  • Team average: 1013 against 995.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +8.
  • Rating after: 963
04ii
162nd ➔ 140th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 980
  • Team average: 1013 against 995.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +8.
  • Rating after: 988
vs
Losers
Luke6193
160th ➔ 165th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 982
  • Team average: 995 against 1013.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 974
Zhako
37th ➔ 59th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1009
  • Team average: 995 against 1013.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 1001
ThranYang
92nd ➔ 144th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 991
  • Team average: 995 against 1013.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 983
ikkitousen
80th ➔ 91st · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 999
  • Team average: 995 against 1013.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -8.
  • Rating after: 991
Pelennor Fields
Pelennor Fields
GameRotWK
PatchPatch 2.02 (9.8.0)
Gamemode4 versus 4
Duration00:37:50
Date1792619339710
ELO +/-8
Likes0
Comments0
Downloads5
Plays2
ReplayDownload
DiscussOpen to like & comment
Watch list
Winners
Matty
5th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1144
  • Team average: 1018 against 1020.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1153
Bredrik
185th ➔ 181st · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 955
  • Team average: 1018 against 1020.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 964
french tax
23rd ➔ 21st · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1027
  • Team average: 1018 against 1020.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1036
HaroonZ
189th ➔ 186th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 946
  • Team average: 1018 against 1020.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 955
vs
Losers
Mustafaa
13th ➔ 16th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1054
  • Team average: 1020 against 1018.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1045
Zhako
30th ➔ 37th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1018
  • Team average: 1020 against 1018.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1009
LeoBonhart
38th ➔ 60th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1010
  • Team average: 1020 against 1018.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1001
ThranYang
80th ➔ 92nd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1020 against 1018.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 991
Eastfarthing Hills
Eastfarthing Hills
GameRotWK
PatchPatch 2.02 (9.8.0)
Gamemode4 versus 4
Duration00:12:44
Date1792617893918
ELO +/-9
Likes0
Comments0
Downloads5
Plays1
ReplayDownload
DiscussOpen to like & comment
Watch list
Winners
Matty
5th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1135
  • Team average: 1018 against 1020.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1144
Bredrik
189th ➔ 185th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 946
  • Team average: 1018 against 1020.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 955
LeoBonhart
62nd ➔ 38th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1001
  • Team average: 1018 against 1020.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1010
ThranYang
139th ➔ 80th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 991
  • Team average: 1018 against 1020.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1000
vs
Losers
french tax
21st ➔ 23rd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1036
  • Team average: 1020 against 1018.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1027
HaroonZ
185th ➔ 189th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 955
  • Team average: 1020 against 1018.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 946
Mustafaa
10th ➔ 13th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1063
  • Team average: 1020 against 1018.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1054
Zhako
28th ➔ 30th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1027
  • Team average: 1020 against 1018.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1018
Emerald Islet II
Emerald Islet II
GameRotWK
PatchPatch 2.02 (9.8.0)
Gamemode4 versus 4
Duration00:12:49
Date1792616984622
ELO +/-9
Likes0
Comments0
Downloads5
Plays0
ReplayDownload
DiscussOpen to like & comment
Watch list
Winners
Matty
5th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1126
  • Team average: 1018 against 1018.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1135
Magosh
194th ➔ 193rd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 936
  • Team average: 1018 against 1018.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 945
Zhako
33rd ➔ 28th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1018
  • Team average: 1018 against 1018.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1027
LeoBonhart
82nd ➔ 62nd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 992
  • Team average: 1018 against 1018.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1001
vs
Losers
Bredrik
182nd ➔ 189th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 955
  • Team average: 1018 against 1018.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 946
french tax
17th ➔ 21st · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1045
  • Team average: 1018 against 1018.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1036
ThranYang
unranked ➔ 139th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1018 against 1018.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 991
Mustafaa
10th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1072
  • Team average: 1018 against 1018.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1063
South Ithilien
South Ithilien
GameRotWK
PatchPatch 2.02 (9.8.0)
Gamemode4 versus 4
Duration00:15:25
Date1792615620644
ELO +/-9
Likes0
Comments0
Downloads7
Plays0
ReplayDownload
DiscussOpen to like & comment
Watch list
Winners
Matty
5th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1117
  • Team average: 999 against 1000.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1126
Magosh
194th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 927
  • Team average: 999 against 1000.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 936
HaroonZ
188th ➔ 185th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 946
  • Team average: 999 against 1000.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 955
Zhako
56th ➔ 33rd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1009
  • Team average: 999 against 1000.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1018
vs
Losers
Bredrik
180th ➔ 182nd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 964
  • Team average: 1000 against 999.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 955
french tax
14th ➔ 17th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1054
  • Team average: 1000 against 999.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1045
Ercan
151st ➔ 167th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 982
  • Team average: 1000 against 999.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 973
LeoBonhart
60th ➔ 82nd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1001
  • Team average: 1000 against 999.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 992
Lanthir Lamath
Lanthir Lamath
GameRotWK
PatchPatch 2.02 (9.8.0)
Gamemode4 versus 4
Duration00:18:20
Date1792613647513
ELO +/-9
Likes0
Comments0
Downloads5
Plays0
ReplayDownload
DiscussOpen to like & comment
Watch list
Winners
Matty
6th ➔ 5th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1108
  • Team average: 995 against 993.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1117
Bredrik
185th ➔ 180th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 955
  • Team average: 995 against 993.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 964
Magosh
196th ➔ 194th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 918
  • Team average: 995 against 993.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 927
Zhako
62nd ➔ 56th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 995 against 993.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1009
vs
Losers
Solenar
31st ➔ 37th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1018
  • Team average: 993 against 995.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1009
HaroonZ
183rd ➔ 188th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 955
  • Team average: 993 against 995.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 946
Ercan
95th ➔ 151st · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 991
  • Team average: 993 against 995.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 982
LeoBonhart
38th ➔ 60th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1010
  • Team average: 993 against 995.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1001
Eastfarthing Hills
Eastfarthing Hills
GameRotWK
PatchPatch 2.02 (9.8.0)
Gamemode4 versus 4
Duration00:17:39
Date1792612336462
ELO +/-9
Likes0
Comments0
Downloads8
Plays1
ReplayDownload
DiscussOpen to like & comment
Watch list
Clan war[CP] vs [BILB] · Game 2 of 2War: Drawn 1-1[CP] 1113 → 1108 How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1113
  • Clan ratings: 1113 against 1000.
  • Expected result: 66%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
  • Step size: 32.
  • Rating after: 1108
32 × (0.5 - 0.66) = -5 · #2[BILB] 1000 → 1010 How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Clan ratings: 1000 against 1113.
  • Expected result: 34%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
  • Step size: 64, doubled during a clan's first 10 wars.
  • Rating after: 1010
64 × (0.5 - 0.34) = +10 · #5 → #4Placement war, counts double: Excelsior, wowowowow, leslotje, FlyingCow, DrThrax
Winners
Masho
9th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1068
  • Side average: 1150 against 985.
  • Expected result: 72%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
  • Step size: 40.
  • Rating after: 1059
40 × (0.5 - 0.72) = -9
Poero
1st · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1267
  • Side average: 1150 against 985.
  • Expected result: 72%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
  • Step size: 40.
  • Rating after: 1258
40 × (0.5 - 0.72) = -9
Excelsior
unranked ➔ 11th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1048
  • Side average: 1150 against 985.
  • Expected result: 72%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
  • Step size: 80, doubled for placement war 5 of 5.
  • Rating after: 1030
80 × (0.5 - 0.72) = -18
konkwi31
2nd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1218
  • Side average: 1150 against 985.
  • Expected result: 72%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
  • Step size: 40.
  • Rating after: 1209
40 × (0.5 - 0.72) = -9
vs
Losers
wowowowow
How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1004
  • Side average: 985 against 1150.
  • Expected result: 28%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
  • Step size: 80, doubled for placement war 4 of 5.
  • Rating after: 1022
80 × (0.5 - 0.28) = +18
leslotje
How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 989
  • Side average: 985 against 1150.
  • Expected result: 28%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
  • Step size: 80, doubled for placement war 3 of 5.
  • Rating after: 1007
80 × (0.5 - 0.28) = +18
FlyingCow
How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 974
  • Side average: 985 against 1150.
  • Expected result: 28%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
  • Step size: 80, doubled for placement war 2 of 5.
  • Rating after: 992
80 × (0.5 - 0.28) = +18
DrThrax
How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 974
  • Side average: 985 against 1150.
  • Expected result: 28%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
  • Step size: 80, doubled for placement war 2 of 5.
  • Rating after: 992
80 × (0.5 - 0.28) = +18
Ered Mithrin
Ered Mithrin
GameRotWK
PatchPatch 2.02 (9.8.0)
GamemodeClan war
Duration00:35:21
Date1792354158767
ELO +/--
Likes0
Comments0
Downloads9
Plays1
ReplayDownload
DiscussOpen to like & comment
Watch list
Clan war[CP] vs [BILB] · Game 1 of 2War: Drawn 1-1[CP] 1113 → 1108 How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1113
  • Clan ratings: 1113 against 1000.
  • Expected result: 66%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
  • Step size: 32.
  • Rating after: 1108
32 × (0.5 - 0.66) = -5 · #2[BILB] 1000 → 1010 How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Clan ratings: 1000 against 1113.
  • Expected result: 34%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
  • Step size: 64, doubled during a clan's first 10 wars.
  • Rating after: 1010
64 × (0.5 - 0.34) = +10 · #5 → #4Placement war, counts double: Excelsior, wowowowow, leslotje, FlyingCow, DrThrax
Winners
wowowowow
How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1004
  • Side average: 985 against 1150.
  • Expected result: 28%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
  • Step size: 80, doubled for placement war 4 of 5.
  • Rating after: 1022
80 × (0.5 - 0.28) = +18
leslotje
How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 989
  • Side average: 985 against 1150.
  • Expected result: 28%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
  • Step size: 80, doubled for placement war 3 of 5.
  • Rating after: 1007
80 × (0.5 - 0.28) = +18
FlyingCow
How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 974
  • Side average: 985 against 1150.
  • Expected result: 28%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
  • Step size: 80, doubled for placement war 2 of 5.
  • Rating after: 992
80 × (0.5 - 0.28) = +18
DrThrax
How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 974
  • Side average: 985 against 1150.
  • Expected result: 28%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
  • Step size: 80, doubled for placement war 2 of 5.
  • Rating after: 992
80 × (0.5 - 0.28) = +18
vs
Losers
Masho
9th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1068
  • Side average: 1150 against 985.
  • Expected result: 72%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
  • Step size: 40.
  • Rating after: 1059
40 × (0.5 - 0.72) = -9
Poero
1st · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1267
  • Side average: 1150 against 985.
  • Expected result: 72%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
  • Step size: 40.
  • Rating after: 1258
40 × (0.5 - 0.72) = -9
Excelsior
unranked ➔ 11th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1048
  • Side average: 1150 against 985.
  • Expected result: 72%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
  • Step size: 80, doubled for placement war 5 of 5.
  • Rating after: 1030
80 × (0.5 - 0.72) = -18
konkwi31
2nd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1218
  • Side average: 1150 against 985.
  • Expected result: 72%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war drawn, counts as 0.5.
  • Step size: 40.
  • Rating after: 1209
40 × (0.5 - 0.72) = -9
Umbar Peninsula
Umbar Peninsula
GameRotWK
PatchPatch 2.02 (9.8.0)
GamemodeClan war
Duration00:32:05
Date1792352066116
ELO +/--
Likes0
Comments0
Downloads8
Plays1
ReplayDownload
DiscussOpen to like & comment
Watch list
Clan war[BILB] vs [CP] · Game 2 of 2War: [CP] won 2-0[BILB] 1025 → 1000 How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1025
  • Clan ratings: 1025 against 1100.
  • Expected result: 39%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war lost, counts as 0.
  • Step size: 64, doubled during a clan's first 10 wars.
  • Rating after: 1000
64 × (0 - 0.39) = -25 · #4[CP] 1100 → 1113 How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1100
  • Clan ratings: 1100 against 1025.
  • Expected result: 61%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war won, counts as 1.
  • Step size: 32.
  • Rating after: 1113
32 × (1 - 0.61) = +13 · #3Placement war, counts double: FlyingCow, wowowowow, leslotje, DrThrax, Excelsior
Winners
Excelsior
How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1022
  • Side average: 1134 against 1011.
  • Expected result: 67%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war won, counts as 1.
  • Step size: 80, doubled for placement war 4 of 5.
  • Rating after: 1048
80 × (1 - 0.67) = +26
Poero
1st · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1254
  • Side average: 1134 against 1011.
  • Expected result: 67%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war won, counts as 1.
  • Step size: 40.
  • Rating after: 1267
40 × (1 - 0.67) = +13
konkwi31
2nd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1205
  • Side average: 1134 against 1011.
  • Expected result: 67%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war won, counts as 1.
  • Step size: 40.
  • Rating after: 1218
40 × (1 - 0.67) = +13
Masho
10th ➔ 9th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1055
  • Side average: 1134 against 1011.
  • Expected result: 67%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war won, counts as 1.
  • Step size: 40.
  • Rating after: 1068
40 × (1 - 0.67) = +13
vs
Losers
FlyingCow
How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Side average: 1011 against 1134.
  • Expected result: 33%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war lost, counts as 0.
  • Step size: 80, doubled for placement war 1 of 5.
  • Rating after: 974
80 × (0 - 0.33) = -26
wowowowow
How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1030
  • Side average: 1011 against 1134.
  • Expected result: 33%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war lost, counts as 0.
  • Step size: 80, doubled for placement war 3 of 5.
  • Rating after: 1004
80 × (0 - 0.33) = -26
leslotje
How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1015
  • Side average: 1011 against 1134.
  • Expected result: 33%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war lost, counts as 0.
  • Step size: 80, doubled for placement war 2 of 5.
  • Rating after: 989
80 × (0 - 0.33) = -26
DrThrax
How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Side average: 1011 against 1134.
  • Expected result: 33%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war lost, counts as 0.
  • Step size: 80, doubled for placement war 1 of 5.
  • Rating after: 974
80 × (0 - 0.33) = -26
West Rohan
West Rohan
GameRotWK
PatchPatch 2.02 (9.8.0)
GamemodeClan war
Duration00:19:03
Date1792350684921
ELO +/--
Likes0
Comments0
Downloads7
Plays1
ReplayDownload
DiscussOpen to like & comment
Watch list
Clan war[BILB] vs [CP] · Game 1 of 2War: [CP] won 2-0[BILB] 1025 → 1000 How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1025
  • Clan ratings: 1025 against 1100.
  • Expected result: 39%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war lost, counts as 0.
  • Step size: 64, doubled during a clan's first 10 wars.
  • Rating after: 1000
64 × (0 - 0.39) = -25 · #4[CP] 1100 → 1113 How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1100
  • Clan ratings: 1100 against 1025.
  • Expected result: 61%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war won, counts as 1.
  • Step size: 32.
  • Rating after: 1113
32 × (1 - 0.61) = +13 · #3Placement war, counts double: FlyingCow, wowowowow, leslotje, DrThrax, Excelsior
Winners
Excelsior
How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1022
  • Side average: 1134 against 1011.
  • Expected result: 67%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war won, counts as 1.
  • Step size: 80, doubled for placement war 4 of 5.
  • Rating after: 1048
80 × (1 - 0.67) = +26
Poero
1st · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1254
  • Side average: 1134 against 1011.
  • Expected result: 67%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war won, counts as 1.
  • Step size: 40.
  • Rating after: 1267
40 × (1 - 0.67) = +13
konkwi31
2nd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1205
  • Side average: 1134 against 1011.
  • Expected result: 67%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war won, counts as 1.
  • Step size: 40.
  • Rating after: 1218
40 × (1 - 0.67) = +13
Masho
10th ➔ 9th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1055
  • Side average: 1134 against 1011.
  • Expected result: 67%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war won, counts as 1.
  • Step size: 40.
  • Rating after: 1068
40 × (1 - 0.67) = +13
vs
Losers
FlyingCow
How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Side average: 1011 against 1134.
  • Expected result: 33%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war lost, counts as 0.
  • Step size: 80, doubled for placement war 1 of 5.
  • Rating after: 974
80 × (0 - 0.33) = -26
wowowowow
How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1030
  • Side average: 1011 against 1134.
  • Expected result: 33%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war lost, counts as 0.
  • Step size: 80, doubled for placement war 3 of 5.
  • Rating after: 1004
80 × (0 - 0.33) = -26
leslotje
How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1015
  • Side average: 1011 against 1134.
  • Expected result: 33%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war lost, counts as 0.
  • Step size: 80, doubled for placement war 2 of 5.
  • Rating after: 989
80 × (0 - 0.33) = -26
DrThrax
How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Side average: 1011 against 1134.
  • Expected result: 33%, where an even match is 50%.
  • Result: war lost, counts as 0.
  • Step size: 80, doubled for placement war 1 of 5.
  • Rating after: 974
80 × (0 - 0.33) = -26
Hills of Evendim
Hills of Evendim
GameRotWK
PatchPatch 2.02 (9.8.0)
GamemodeClan war
Duration00:12:00
Date1792349769435
ELO +/--
Likes0
Comments0
Downloads7
Plays0
ReplayDownload
DiscussOpen to like & comment
Watch list
Winners
Matty
8th ➔ 6th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1099
  • Team average: 1079 against 1078.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1108
HaroonZ
188th ➔ 185th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 946
  • Team average: 1079 against 1078.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 955
Bark
2nd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1172
  • Team average: 1079 against 1078.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1181
Truck
6th ➔ 5th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1101
  • Team average: 1079 against 1078.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1110
vs
Losers
Orcy
141st ➔ 162nd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 989
  • Team average: 1078 against 1079.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 980
Poero
1st · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1195
  • Team average: 1078 against 1079.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1186
Masho
5th ➔ 7th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1111
  • Team average: 1078 against 1079.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1102
LeoBonhart
30th ➔ 38th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1019
  • Team average: 1078 against 1079.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1010
Desert of Rhun
Desert of Rhun
GameRotWK
PatchPatch 2.02 (9.8.0)
Gamemode4 versus 4
Duration00:40:47
Date1792338909369
ELO +/-9
Likes0
Comments0
Downloads13
Plays1
ReplayDownload
DiscussOpen to like & comment
Watch list
Winners
Matty
8th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1090
  • Team average: 1081 against 1076.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1099
Orcy
162nd ➔ 141st · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 980
  • Team average: 1081 against 1076.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 989
Bark
2nd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1163
  • Team average: 1081 against 1076.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1172
Truck
7th ➔ 6th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1092
  • Team average: 1081 against 1076.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1101
vs
Losers
Poero
1st · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1204
  • Team average: 1076 against 1081.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1195
LeoBonhart
24th ➔ 30th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1028
  • Team average: 1076 against 1081.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1019
Masho
5th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1120
  • Team average: 1076 against 1081.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1111
Geralt
185th ➔ 191st · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 954
  • Team average: 1076 against 1081.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 945
Lower Iron Hills
Lower Iron Hills
GameRotWK
PatchPatch 2.02 (9.8.0)
Gamemode4 versus 4
Duration00:18:48
Date1792337442642
ELO +/-9
Likes0
Comments0
Downloads10
Plays0
ReplayDownload
DiscussOpen to like & comment
Watch list
Winners
Poero
1st · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1195
  • Team average: 1078 against 1079.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1204
Bark
3rd ➔ 2nd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1154
  • Team average: 1078 against 1079.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1163
LeoBonhart
30th ➔ 24th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1019
  • Team average: 1078 against 1079.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1028
Geralt
191st ➔ 185th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 945
  • Team average: 1078 against 1079.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 954
vs
Losers
Matty
8th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1099
  • Team average: 1079 against 1078.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1090
Orcy
141st ➔ 162nd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 989
  • Team average: 1079 against 1078.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 980
Masho
5th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1129
  • Team average: 1079 against 1078.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1120
Truck
6th ➔ 7th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1101
  • Team average: 1079 against 1078.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1092
Nanduhirion
Nanduhirion
GameRotWK
PatchPatch 2.02 (9.8.0)
Gamemode4 versus 4
Duration00:20:51
Date1792336060774
ELO +/-9
Likes0
Comments0
Downloads9
Plays0
ReplayDownload
DiscussOpen to like & comment
Watch list
Winners
Matty
8th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1090
  • Team average: 1076 against 1080.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1099
Orcy
162nd ➔ 141st · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 980
  • Team average: 1076 against 1080.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 989
Bark
4th ➔ 3rd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1145
  • Team average: 1076 against 1080.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1154
Truck
7th ➔ 6th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1092
  • Team average: 1076 against 1080.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1101
vs
Losers
Feanor
28th ➔ 38th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1024
  • Team average: 1080 against 1076.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1015
Poero
1st · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1204
  • Team average: 1080 against 1076.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1195
Masho
5th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1138
  • Team average: 1080 against 1076.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1129
Geralt
185th ➔ 191st · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 954
  • Team average: 1080 against 1076.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 945
Desert of Rhun
Desert of Rhun
GameRotWK
PatchPatch 2.02 (9.8.0)
Gamemode4 versus 4
Duration00:32:56
Date1792333077497
ELO +/-9
Likes0
Comments0
Downloads10
Plays0
ReplayDownload
DiscussOpen to like & comment
Watch list
Winners
Matty
8th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1081
  • Team average: 1077 against 1079.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1090
Feanor
38th ➔ 28th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1015
  • Team average: 1077 against 1079.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1024
Masho
5th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1129
  • Team average: 1077 against 1079.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1138
Truck
7th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1083
  • Team average: 1077 against 1079.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1092
vs
Losers
Poero
1st · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1213
  • Team average: 1079 against 1077.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1204
Orcy
141st ➔ 162nd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 989
  • Team average: 1079 against 1077.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 980
Bark
3rd ➔ 4th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1154
  • Team average: 1079 against 1077.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1145
Geralt
180th ➔ 185th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 963
  • Team average: 1079 against 1077.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 954
Tumladen Valley
Tumladen Valley
GameRotWK
PatchPatch 2.02 (9.8.0)
Gamemode4 versus 4
Duration00:06:43
Date1792332565423
ELO +/-9
Likes0
Comments0
Downloads13
Plays0
ReplayDownload
DiscussOpen to like & comment
Watch list
Winners
Matty
10th ➔ 8th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1072
  • Team average: 1052 against 1048.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1081
Orcy
163rd ➔ 141st · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 980
  • Team average: 1052 against 1048.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 989
Poero
1st · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1204
  • Team average: 1052 against 1048.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1213
Geralt
186th ➔ 180th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 954
  • Team average: 1052 against 1048.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 963
vs
Losers
Feanor
28th ➔ 38th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1024
  • Team average: 1048 against 1052.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1015
DiCaprio
15th ➔ 19th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1053
  • Team average: 1048 against 1052.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1044
HaroonZ
182nd ➔ 189th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 955
  • Team average: 1048 against 1052.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 946
Bark
2nd ➔ 3rd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1163
  • Team average: 1048 against 1052.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1154
Lower Dunland
Lower Dunland
GameRotWK
PatchPatch 2.02 (9.8.0)
Gamemode4 versus 4
Duration00:12:15
Date1792331559629
ELO +/-9
Likes0
Comments0
Downloads11
Plays0
ReplayDownload
DiscussOpen to like & comment
Watch list
Winners
Matty
10th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1063
  • Team average: 1050 against 1050.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1072
Feanor
38th ➔ 28th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1015
  • Team average: 1050 against 1050.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1024
Orcy
177th ➔ 163rd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 971
  • Team average: 1050 against 1050.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 980
Bark
3rd ➔ 2nd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1154
  • Team average: 1050 against 1050.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1163
vs
Losers
HaroonZ
180th ➔ 182nd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 964
  • Team average: 1050 against 1050.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 955
DiCaprio
11th ➔ 15th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1062
  • Team average: 1050 against 1050.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1053
Poero
1st · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1213
  • Team average: 1050 against 1050.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1204
Geralt
181st ➔ 186th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 963
  • Team average: 1050 against 1050.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 954
Lanthir Lamath
Lanthir Lamath
GameRotWK
PatchPatch 2.02 (9.8.0)
Gamemode4 versus 4
Duration00:39:21
Date1792329064058
ELO +/-9
Likes0
Comments0
Downloads8
Plays0
ReplayDownload
DiscussOpen to like & comment
Watch list
Winners
Orcy
181st ➔ 177th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 962
  • Team average: 1069 against 1069.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 971
Bark
4th ➔ 3rd · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1145
  • Team average: 1069 against 1069.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1154
Sody 1 09
16th ➔ 14th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1051
  • Team average: 1069 against 1069.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1060
Masho
5th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1120
  • Team average: 1069 against 1069.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1129
vs
Losers
Matty
9th ➔ 10th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1072
  • Team average: 1069 against 1069.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1063
Poero
1st · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1222
  • Team average: 1069 against 1069.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1213
DiCaprio
11th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1071
  • Team average: 1069 against 1069.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1062
Mansaw
198th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 913
  • Team average: 1069 against 1069.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 904
Fords of Glanduin
Fords of Glanduin
GameRotWK
PatchPatch 2.02 (9.8.0)
Gamemode4 versus 4
Duration00:16:19
Date1792245253510
ELO +/-9
Likes0
Comments0
Downloads11
Plays0
ReplayDownload
DiscussOpen to like & comment
Watch list
Winners
Poero
1st · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1213
  • Team average: 1072 against 1069.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1222
DiCaprio
12th ➔ 11th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1062
  • Team average: 1072 against 1069.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1071
Masho
5th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1111
  • Team average: 1072 against 1069.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1120
Mansaw
198th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 904
  • Team average: 1072 against 1069.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 913
vs
Losers
Matty
8th ➔ 9th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1081
  • Team average: 1069 against 1072.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1072
Orcy
177th ➔ 181st · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 971
  • Team average: 1069 against 1072.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 962
Bark
3rd ➔ 4th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1154
  • Team average: 1069 against 1072.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1145
P B R
11th ➔ 13th · How this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1070
  • Team average: 1069 against 1072.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 1061
Ithilien Plains
Ithilien Plains
GameRotWK
PatchPatch 2.02 (9.8.0)
Gamemode4 versus 4
Duration00:34:00
Date1792243054767
ELO +/-9
Likes0
Comments1
Downloads11
Plays1
ReplayDownload
DiscussOpen to like & comment
Watch list
Comments (1)
P B R
thats why i never play 4v4s .. sry for dc guys
♥ 1
Winners
Tomasss
189th ➔ 186th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Pivas
138th ➔ 79th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
LeoBonhart
37th ➔ 30th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Makaa
50th ➔ 34th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
vs
Losers
Glaurung
175th ➔ 178th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
SeekFirst
58th ➔ 63rd · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
The Fallen
152nd ➔ 167th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Felipemito
45th ➔ 62nd · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Eastfarthing Hills
Eastfarthing Hills
GameRotWK
PatchPatch 2.02 (9.8.0)
Gamemode4 versus 4
Duration00:29:27
Date1791758173577
ELO +/-9
Likes0
Comments0
Downloads10
Plays1
ReplayDownload
DiscussOpen to like & comment
Watch list
Winners
Glaurung
177th ➔ 175th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
LeoBonhart
62nd ➔ 37th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Iconic
168th ➔ 162nd · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
SeekFirst
70th ➔ 58th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
vs
Losers
Tomasss
183rd ➔ 189th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Pivas
unranked ➔ 138th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Naderr
unranked ➔ 139th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
The Fallen
98th ➔ 152nd · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Lower Dunland
Lower Dunland
GameRotWK
PatchPatch 2.02 (9.8.0)
Gamemode4 versus 4
Duration00:15:01
Date1791756886084
ELO +/-9
Likes0
Comments0
Downloads11
Plays0
ReplayDownload
DiscussOpen to like & comment
Watch list
Winners
french tax
18th ➔ 14th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Bark
4th ➔ 3rd · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
FlyingCow
19th ➔ 15th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Glaurung
184th ➔ 178th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
vs
Losers
Matty
8th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
DrThrax
21st ➔ 22nd · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Truck
7th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
zerk
143rd ➔ 163rd · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Nanduhirion
Nanduhirion
GameRotWK
PatchPatch 2.02 (9.8.0)
Gamemode4 versus 4
Duration00:31:26
Date1791669915061
ELO +/-9
Likes0
Comments0
Downloads14
Plays1
ReplayDownload
DiscussOpen to like & comment
Watch list
Winners
Matty
8th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
french tax
22nd ➔ 18th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Bark
4th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Glaurung
189th ➔ 184th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
vs
Losers
FlyingCow
14th ➔ 19th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
DrThrax
16th ➔ 21st · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Truck
6th ➔ 7th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
zerk
82nd ➔ 143rd · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Umbar Peninsula
Umbar Peninsula
GameRotWK
PatchPatch 2.02 (9.8.0)
Gamemode4 versus 4
Duration00:21:14
Date1791668523701
ELO +/-9
Likes0
Comments0
Downloads13
Plays1
ReplayDownload
DiscussOpen to like & comment
Watch list
Winners
Bark
4th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
FlyingCow
19th ➔ 14th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
DrThrax
21st ➔ 16th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Glaurung
190th ➔ 189th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
vs
Losers
Matty
8th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
french tax
18th ➔ 22nd · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Zhako
57th ➔ 63rd · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
zerk
63rd ➔ 82nd · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Lanthir Lamath
Lanthir Lamath
GameRotWK
PatchPatch 2.02 (9.8.0)
Gamemode4 versus 4
Duration00:18:15
Date1791667059904
ELO +/-9
Likes0
Comments0
Downloads13
Plays0
ReplayDownload
DiscussOpen to like & comment
Watch list
Winners
Kyagara
29th ➔ 27th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Aupif
142nd ➔ 91st · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
_Gimli_
112th ➔ 79th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Maxx
unranked ➔ 56th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
vs
Losers
dougin
unranked ➔ 136th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
MELKORRR
unranked ➔ 137th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Theodred10
unranked ➔ 138th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
winnible
unranked ➔ 139th · How this was worked out
  • The change depends on the rating gap. Beating a higher-rated side pays more, and losing to a lower-rated side costs more.
  • This game was played before the full breakdown was recorded.
Pelennor Fields Outskirts
Pelennor Fields Outskirts
GameRotWK
PatchPatch 2.02 (9.8.0)
Gamemode4 versus 4
Duration00:06:52
Date1791665299257
ELO +/-9
Likes0
Comments0
Downloads8
Plays0
ReplayDownload
DiscussOpen to like & comment
Watch list
PreviousPage 1Next