← Home

Bergkamp

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 160 / 2,000 XP
1,940 XP to level 2
FACTION LEVELS
Mordor
RotWK

LAST 5 SEASONS

No finished seasons on this patch yet.

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
P0wys
12W 1L, 92% over 13 games
NeYo
13W 8L
62%
Glaurungg
8W 11L
42%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
Bergkamp & SewyMoP0Ga
7W 5L
58%
Bergkamp & NeYo
6W 4L
60%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
SSSSS & the oddyssy
2W 3L
40%
DOVUD & kingsman & Mrko & YAHYO
0W 5L
0%
68 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 50 games with each of 4 different factions in BFME1.
Many Tongues
1.6% of players
Play 500 ranked games. Ranger of the North · 7 Aug 2026 Captain of Gondor · 7 Aug 2026
Captain of Gondor
Level 2 of 4
2.7% of players
Win 100 games.
Sword of the West
Level 1 of 3
5% of players
Win 10 games in a row.
The Beacons Are Lit
Level 1 of 3
6.2% of players
Lose 500 games and keep fighting.
The Long Defeat
1.1% of players
Spend 100 hours in Middle Earth.
The Long Watch
Level 1 of 3
3.8% of players
Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
4.8% of players

Recent matches

AllWonLost
LBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1057
  • Team average: 981 against 1118.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -2.
  • Rating after: 1055
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:13:14·2026-10-24 18:27 UTC
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1060
  • Team average: 994 against 1115.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -3.
  • Rating after: 1057
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:15:29·2026-10-24 18:07 UTC
WBFME1Dimrill Dale NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1057
  • Team average: 1032 against 915.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +3.
  • Rating after: 1060
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:16:44·2026-10-24 17:48 UTC
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1058
  • Team average: 988 against 1169.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 1057
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:00·2026-10-21 16:07 UTC
LBFME1Near Harad NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1061
  • Team average: 978 against 1090.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -3.
  • Rating after: 1058
Isengard·3 versus 3 NM·00:08:50·2026-10-21 15:50 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1063
  • Team average: 940 against 1073.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -2.
  • Rating after: 1061
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:12:59·2026-10-21 15:33 UTC
WBFME1Dead Marshes NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1056
  • Team average: 1022 against 973.
  • Favourite, so a win pays less and a loss costs more.
  • Win: +7.
  • Rating after: 1063
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:20:19·2026-10-21 15:05 UTC
WBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1047
  • Team average: 1001 against 1025.
  • An even match.
  • Win: +9.
  • Rating after: 1056
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:17:28·2026-10-05 19:15 UTC
LBFME1Lond Daer Enedh NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1052
  • Team average: 1031 against 1105.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 1047
Gondor·3 versus 3 NM·00:10:02·2026-10-05 18:53 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1056
  • Team average: 1012 against 1101.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -4.
  • Rating after: 1052
Rohan·3 versus 3 NM·00:11:12·2026-10-05 18:33 UTC