← Home

ElDictador

📍 Unknown
Compare stats

LEVEL

Level 11,290 / 2,000 XP
710 XP to level 2
FACTION LEVELS
Isengard
BFME1MAIN
Gondor
BFME1
Rohan
BFME1
Mordor
BFME1

LAST 5 SEASONS

Patch 2.22
3 versus 3 · BFME1
BEST
#959
#959
Season 2
896 pts
0W / 20L
2026-11-01
Patch 2.22
4 versus 4 · BFME1
BEST
#319
#319
Season 2
991 pts
0W / 1L
2026-11-01

Teams

Allies
Record with each player, most played first.
BEST ALLY
Escu
0W 20L, 0% over 20 games
Escu
0W 20L
0%
Laetus77
0W 20L
0%
Played with
Record in each line-up.
ElDictador & Escu & Laetus77
0W 18L
0%
EldelDog & ElDictador & Escu & Laetus77
0W 1L
0%
Played against
Record against each line-up faced.
fakamaka & mk today & radju9698
0W 3L
0%
Cairpre & DraG0 & i won it 2
0W 2L
0%
20 more, for supporters
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

With and against

This is a supporter perk
Support the project to see every ally, every opponent and every team you have played with. SEE SUPPORTER OPTIONS

Achievements

Play 10 games in a ranked season.
The Turning of the Year
Level 1 of 2
7.5% of players
LBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 897
  • Team average: 904 against 1070.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -1.
  • Rating after: 896
Rohan3 versus 3 NM00:10:162026-09-30 15:22 UTC
LBFME1The Shire NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 903
  • Team average: 910 against 975.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 897
Isengard3 versus 3 NM00:15:132026-09-30 15:02 UTC
LBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 909
  • Team average: 916 against 975.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 903
Isengard3 versus 3 NM00:15:572026-09-30 14:41 UTC
LBFME1Near Harad NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 911
  • Team average: 918 against 1052.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -2.
  • Rating after: 909
Isengard3 versus 3 NM00:08:562026-09-30 14:29 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin II NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 1000
  • Team average: 1000 against 992.
  • An even match.
  • Loss: -9.
  • Rating after: 991
Isengard4 versus 4 NM00:12:352026-09-29 17:20 UTC
LBFME1Lebennin NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 916
  • Team average: 923 against 1007.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 911
Isengard3 versus 3 NM00:13:002026-09-29 16:55 UTC
LBFME1South Rhun NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 921
  • Team average: 928 against 1006.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 916
Isengard3 versus 3 NM00:15:382026-09-29 16:35 UTC
LBFME1Dead Marshes NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 927
  • Team average: 934 against 1000.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 921
Isengard3 versus 3 NM00:12:322026-09-29 16:18 UTC
LBFME1Nurn NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 933
  • Team average: 940 against 1005.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -6.
  • Rating after: 927
Isengard3 versus 3 NM00:15:332026-09-29 15:59 UTC
LBFME1Lossarnach NMHow this was worked out
  • Rating before: 938
  • Team average: 945 against 1022.
  • Underdog, so a win pays more and a loss costs less.
  • Loss: -5.
  • Rating after: 933
Isengard3 versus 3 NM00:12:482026-09-29 15:37 UTC